AI Political Compass Tester is a political orientation assessment that maps your economic and social values onto a two-axis compass from 30 propositions. Unlike generic chatbots that flatten mixed beliefs into a party label, this agent scores each axis independently and retains prior reports. On Jenova, it uses models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and more plus map, PDF, and email export. It describes instincts; it does not tell you how to vote.
Political Compass Tester administers 30 value-based propositions, one per turn, on a four-point scale: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. Items target first reactions to markets, redistribution, civil liberties, criminal justice, and state authority rather than this year's bills or a single country's ballot. Economic and social statements alternate so a run of tax items does not prime a run of speech items.
Political Compass Tester reports coordinates from −10.0 to +10.0 on Economic Left–Right and Social Authoritarian–Libertarian, then assigns a quadrant only when the scores warrant one. Leftward economic answers pull toward collectivism, public provision, and labor protections; rightward answers pull toward free markets, low taxation, and property-rights primacy. Libertarian social answers pull toward privacy and personal autonomy; authoritarian answers pull toward social order, state capacity, and collective discipline.
Political Compass Tester writes a structured report after the 30th response: date and session ID, coordinates, a quadrant when appropriate, topic-area tables with lean and strength, a profile of the connecting value system, internal-consistency notes, strongest convictions, and an interpretive comparison of internationally recognizable political figures. Placements of those figures are labeled approximate. Scores within about ±1.0 of center are called out as near-centrist instead of being forced into a tribal box.
Political Compass Tester presents each item as a numbered statement with its axis label and offers no commentary, score tease, or wording debate between turns. Previous answers stay final; leaving before proposition 30 produces no partial report. A retake draws a new proposition set so the form cannot be memorized, while the earlier write-up remains available in the thread.
Political Compass Tester can plot your point beside comparative figures, download the write-up as a PDF, or email the report once scoring is complete. Export keeps a two-axis estimate from dissolving into unfiled chat text you cannot share or compare later.
| Traditional Approach | Political Compass Tester |
|---|---|
| One left–right or party label | Independent Economic and Social scores |
| News-cycle trivia and slogans | Value propositions, first reactions |
| Lost coordinates on every retake | Prior report stays in the thread |
| A dot with no interpretation | Topic-area leans and tension notes |
Unlimited Memory vs. Chatbot Amnesia
A generic chatbot that forgets your first-session coordinates, topic-area leans, and strongest convictions turns a retake into an isolated vibe check. Political Compass Tester keeps the prior formal report in the thread when you run a new proposition set, so you can see whether your market-versus-provision or liberty-versus-order tradeoffs actually moved. Losing that history is how people re-identify with a quadrant meme instead of comparing two structured estimates.
Multi-Model AI Access
Administering 30 items needs a rigid, non-argumentative protocol; writing the profile, consistency notes, and comparative-figure table needs analytical prose that can describe cross-cutting tensions without ranking them. Single-vendor lock-in — ChatGPT as OpenAI-only, Claude as Anthropic-only — forces one model through both phases. This agent can route item administration and report drafting across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, Qwen, and more.
Intelligent Tool Integration for End-to-End Workflows
A compass score that lives only in chat is easy to screenshot and misread. Political Compass Tester runs a production flow: 30 SD / D / A / SA responses → independent axis scoring → formal report → compass map, PDF, or emailed write-up. Document export and Gmail keep the measurement from ending as an unfiled conversation.
Values-First Item Design Instead of Slogan Quizzes
Many ideology quizzes reward news consumption and social desirability. Political Compass Tester mixes moderate statements with sharper ones, reverse-scores some items, and lets some load on both axes so the form is harder to game. Coverage rotates through regulation, tax and redistribution, public versus private services, labor and firms, trade, civil liberties, criminal justice, personal freedom, state authority, and social conformity.
Political science students measuring ideology
Undergraduates who always tick a single progressive or conservative box can start a paper on issue dimensionality with coordinates, topic-area tables, and the report's own limitations paragraph instead of a quadrant screenshot.
Writers and newsletter authors calibrating bias
Briefers drafting an election explainer can test whether "independence" is a cross-pressured profile or just a brand, then use the strongest-conviction list as a calibration tool rather than a loyalty test.
Voters whose economic and social views do not travel together
People who favor market provision but reject surveillance, or support redistribution but prefer strict criminal justice, get both axes scored instead of a noisy party-identity proxy.
Anyone heading into a high-stakes civic conversation
A one-proposition-per-turn session on a phone commute produces a map two people can compare without turning dinner into another round of headlines.
Free For exploring Jenova:
Plus ($20/month) For individuals:
Premium ($50/month) For regular users:
Pro ($100/month) For power users:
Max ($200/month) For professionals:
Ultra ($500/month) For heavy professionals:
Enterprise ($1,000/month) For businesses:
All plans are billed monthly with no daily usage caps — your full quota is available immediately on each billing date.
Political Compass Tester is a conversational ideology instrument that places you on Economic Left–Right and Social Authoritarian–Libertarian axes after 30 value propositions. You receive coordinates from −10.0 to +10.0, a quadrant when scores support one, and a written profile of topic-area leans, tensions, and strongest convictions. The AI does not issue a voting recommendation or rank any position on the square.
Political Compass Tester is a 30-item measuring protocol that remembers prior reports, not a general chat that forgets your first-session coordinates when you retake. It can switch among models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, Qwen, and more so item administration stays non-argumentative while the interpretive report can describe cross-cutting tensions in full. Tool integrations then turn those scores into a compass map, PDF, or emailed write-up instead of leaving a dot stranded in a chat window.
Political Compass Tester uses document export, compass-map generation, and Gmail so a finished session becomes a filed report rather than unread chat. After the 30th response, scored coordinates and topic-area tables can become a plot of your point beside comparative figures, a PDF download, or an emailed copy of the write-up. Sessions also accept speech-to-text on iOS and Android when you would rather speak SD, D, A, or SA than type.
The classic site is a 62-proposition static form with a published two-axis plot. This assessment uses 30 conversational items, blocks mid-stream coaching, and spends the second half of the session on topic-area tables, consistency notes, strongest convictions, and a labeled comparative-figure table. It is shorter, more interpretive, and explicit that it is an estimation exercise rather than a validated psychometric battery.
No. Political Compass Tester will not endorse a party, candidate, or quadrant, and it will not treat any coordinate as more moral or more intelligent than another. If you challenge the result, it restates method and data. Campaign or institutional analysis belongs in a separate workflow after you already have a score.
It is an orientation estimate, not a clinical or academic instrument. Two axes cannot capture foreign-policy doctrine, every cultural cleavage, or single-issue positions that cut across the square. Treat the coordinates as a structured mirror, then read the tension notes and the limitations section in the report.
No. Previous responses are final, which keeps the session from becoming a negotiation with yourself. Stopping before proposition 30 produces no partial report. A full retake after results uses a new proposition set so you are not memorizing the last form.
The Economic axis runs from collectivism, redistribution, public provision, and labor protections on the left to free markets, privatization, low taxation, and property-rights primacy on the right. The Social axis runs from civil liberties, privacy, and personal autonomy on the libertarian side to social order, strong state capacity, national security priority, and traditional-values enforcement on the authoritarian side. Those poles define Libertarian Left, Authoritarian Left, Libertarian Right, and Authoritarian Right.
Scores within about ±1.0 of center on either axis are treated as near-centrist, and a quadrant label is less meaningful that close to the origin. The report calls out near-center results instead of forcing them into a tribal box. Topic-area tables still show where your stronger convictions sit even when the overall point is close to the middle.
No. Items are value propositions — for example, whether ability to pay should unlock higher standards of medical care — not whether you support this year's healthcare bill. Country-specific culture-war wording and ballot trivia are avoided so the instrument measures instincts rather than news consumption.
Yes. Political Compass Tester runs with full feature parity on web, iOS, and Android, including speech-to-text if you would rather talk than tap. The one-proposition-per-turn format fits a commute, and settings sync across devices. Download the iOS app or the Android app to run a session without a worksheet.
No. Conversations and assessment data are not used to train public models, are encrypted in transit and at rest, and are not sold or shared with advertisers. A political-values session is treated as private measurement, not content for someone else's training set.
Political Compass Tester is part of Jenova, the most powerful AI agent platform in the world. Jenova provides unified access to leading AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, Qwen, and more — alongside intelligent tool integrations for end-to-end task completion. The platform features persistent cross-session memory, automated workflow orchestration, and full parity across web, iOS, and Android. Developed by Azeroth Inc., a New York-based technology company, Jenova serves users in over 70 countries.
For developers, the Jenova Agent API provides a fully-managed agent backend with built-in orchestration, multi-model routing, memory, storage, and MCP tool support — replacing the need to stitch together raw LLM APIs, vector databases, and custom tool servers.
Contact: [email protected]